McMillan Park Surplus Resolution Markup — Tues, 25 Nov 2014, 12:30pm

The DC Council Committee on Government Operations will hold a markup of the McMillan Park surplus land resolution on Tuesday, November 25th at 12:30 PM in Room 120 of the Wilson Building, which is located at 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.

Members of the public will be unable to speak during the markup session although we need as many bodies in the room as possible to demonstrate our concern to the members of the Committee.

Please contact us with any questions at or 202.213.2690.

Donate button 1

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

CM McDuffie Challenged for Irresponsible Support of McMillan Development

Against the expressed will of thousands of DC residents, Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie testified before the DC Zoning Commission on May 13th that he firmly supports the Gray Administration’s application to re-zone historic McMillan Park for massive development. McDuffie noted that “for the 38-39 years I’ve been on this Earth” the fence has cut off residents’ access to the park, so he supports the Mayor’s plan that would bring high-rise buildings, destroy the majority of the landmark’s historic resources, and cripple the surrounding communities with gridlock traffic.

Former Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner (ANC) for Bloomingdale, Hugh Youngblood, strongly contested McDuffie’s position. “Being fed-up with a chain-link fence is insufficient excuse to bulldoze an Olmsted park listed on the National Register of Historic Places to make room for more cookie-cutter condos and office buildings that they could build on any parking lot in the District. This ill-conceived proposal would overwhelm our neighborhoods with tens of thousands of new car trips per day and toxic air pollution. Councilmember McDuffie should relocate the project somewhere near the metro and save our park.”

Mr. Youngblood added, “The Councilmember misleadingly claims that the plan has been ‘worked on for the last seven years by the development team, the city, and the community.’  In fact, the multitudes who oppose the plan have been marginalized, ignored, characterized as NIMBYs, and otherwise excluded from the process by the powers that be. The Mayor even hired a PR firm from Baltimore to discredit the community.”

McDuffie recently appeared on Kojo Nnamdi’s The Politics Hour where he claimed that the development proposal would provide residents desired amenities like a grocery store, park, and recreation center.  He again argued that the plan reflects community input.  But when asked to comment on the majority opinion revealed by the door-to-door community survey performed by neighbors in 2012, he said, “I don’t know if there’s a way of identifying what a clear majority is” and called the survey “unscientific.”

Mark Mueller, a career scientist, former ANC for Bloomingdale, and chief architect of the 2012 survey emphatically defended the study’s rigor.  “I’ve worked in science for almost 2 decades.  I, along with 15 community members, made a conservative unbiased survey.  Nobody working on the survey stands to gain financially or politically.  Surveyors were strictly scripted as to avoid leading respondents while administering the survey.  The data was analyzed by a statistician from George Washington University who confirmed a 95% confidence level and identified no concerning bias.”

Mueller added, “Councilmember McDuffie reviewed the draft survey form at a 2012 McMillan Advisory Group meeting where the questionnaire was approved.  The Councilmember’s claim of the project’s alignment with community wishes is based solely on the developer’s version of input received during outreach meetings.  For all those meetings, no data was produced. Why does McDuffie dismiss the community’s survey as ‘unscientific’ but rely on the developer’s claims of what came out of community meetings?  Does he consider developer meetings to be ‘scientific’?  Does he believe that the developer’s record of what the community wants is ‘unbiased’? Perhaps McDuffie sees the survey as being unfair because it reflects a community whose ideas are better (or different) than his and the developer’s.”

Beyond dismissing the community survey while on the Kojo Show, McDuffie appeared misinformed about the details of the development proposal, underscoring the irresponsibility of his blanket endorsement of the plan. He was unaware that the proposal includes constructing new private streets in the park and that the plan lacks any assurance of including a grocery store. He gave only passing mention to the overwhelmingly unacceptable traffic impacts that the project would create.

The Zoning Commission is scheduled to conclude its deliberations on the McMillan Park case in late July.

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

Urban Turf: Zoning Commission Not Ready to Approve McMillan, Asks For More Details

Urban Turf posted the following article on its website on May 29, 2014.

McMillan Park Photo

by Lark Turner

At a final Zoning Commission (ZC) hearing on Tuesday night, Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) didn’t exactly get a warm embrace of their plan to redevelop the McMillan Sand Filtration plant.

The commission expressed strong concerns about the height of medical office buildings planned for the site, especially as they relate to nearby rowhomes adjacent to the development (map). They also cast doubt on VMP’s plans to bring in more transit for people living, working and accessing the site.

“McMillan has been like that for so long that I want to make sure that whatever is done there is done right, not just because we want it done,” said the ZC’s head, Anthony Hood. “I don’t have a problem with turning it down, I really don’t, and I’ll go home and sleep real good at night.”

Tuesday’s meeting was the fifth public ZC hearing on the site. The hearings have been filled with neighbors expressing concerns about the development’s effect on the historic site, the height and scale of the development, the traffic impact and the environmental impact. An attorney for Friends of McMillan Park, an advocacy group opposing the development, was present Tuesday to question the project proposed by VMP. The plan for the site has been in the works since 2007.

The developers are seeking approval in part under the C-3-C Planned Unit Development designation, which allows for moderate density. But commissioners aren’t so sure the plans presented fall under that designation.

“The really heavy lift here, the thing that’s most difficult, is this notion that the C3C zone (is) actually compatible with the … plan,” said ZC member Peter May. “That’s really the most troubling thing.”

Member Michael Turnbull expressed the most vociferous opposition to the plan.

“I don’t see a plan. I don’t see a positive plan,” Turnbull said, referring to the the issue of public transit that would serve the site. “You’re asking for a PUD which is stretching the whole idea of what medium density is. Explain to me how you’re going to fix this.”

He also asked VMP to reconsider the height of the medical office building and the grocery store, to which one member of the team responded that both had been carefully thought-out. That wasn’t enough for Turnbull.

“Think about it some more,” he said.

The commission asked for some post-hearing submissions, but other than those the case is closed. Hood said he’d like both parties to be present when the commission starts to deliberate on the case so that they’re available to answer questions, a diversion from usual policy.

At one point during the meeting, Turnbull even called out a member of VMP for apparently smiling while he made his comments. Hood mentioned that, too.

“I see people smiling,” Hood said. “I hope you’re smiling after we vote.”

McMillan Park Negotiations Exclude Community Leaders

Exclusion 2

Community leaders from around McMillan Park, including two former Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners (ANC) and the head of the Bloomingdale Civic Association, are protesting exclusion from crucial talks over the future of the 25-acre historic park located at North Capitol Street and Michigan Avenue. Representatives expressed frustration and anger in recent testimony before the DC Zoning Commission, where the Gray Administration is pressing a case to re-zone McMillan Park for massive development that would overwhelm the landmark with high-rise medical office buildings, thousands of cars, private roads, and a small recreation center.

Gwen Southerland, a former ANC who represented McMillan Park and a long-term member of the McMillan Advisory Group (MAG), detailed in her recent testimony how the Mayor’s political cronies and his development consultant, Vision McMillan Partners (VMP), have deliberately shut-out Bloomingdale and Stronghold community groups from critical negotiations. “ANC 5E is not representing us”, Ms. Southerland said. “The ANC has demonstrated outright disregard for the Community Benefits Agreement that MAG worked tirelessly to prepare. The ANC has partnered with VMP to deceive and divide our community.”

Ms. Southerland’s concerns were shared by Teri Janine Quinn, who spoke on behalf of the Bloomingdale Civic Association (BCA). Ms. Quinn stated that “no amount of community outreach [by VMP] would give them permission to NOT get direct input from the Civic Association,” noting BCA exclusion from negotiations. “The people most impacted need a seat at the table.”

Former Bloomingdale ANC Mark Mueller told the Zoning Commission that he recently resigned from 5E because the “representatives of the community [are] not representing the community” and that ANC 5E violated its own bylaws when it approved a letter of support for VMP. He added that the District Government offers no oversight of ANCs and that ANC 5E is plagued by “unchecked corruption.”

Corruption 3

Candidate for At-Large DC Council, Eugene Puryear, said in his testimony opposing the plan to re-zone McMillan Park, “VMP’s failure to engage key community leaders fits a demonstrated pattern whereby developers superficially project the appearance of community engagement while ignoring the concerns of literally thousands of residents.”

Opposition to the Mayor’s plan to destroy McMillan Park is widespread and deep. Friends of McMillan Park has gathered more than 6,500 signatures on a petition to stop the destructive plan and open the process to more creative solutions. The crowd of opposition witnesses at the May 13th hearing led the Zoning Commission to schedule a fifth hearing for Tuesday, May 27th at 6:30pm. The record remains open until then. Click here to submit your testimony online.

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

Rally to Save McMillan Park! — Tues, 13 May 2014, 515pm

Park Rally

The DC Zoning Commission has completed the first three hearings on the Mayor’s plan to re-zone historic McMillan Park for high-rise development, and the fourth and final hearing is quickly approaching this Tuesday night (May 13th). Please join us for a fun RALLY AND DANCE PARTY occurring before the final hearing in front of the DC Zoning Commission office at Judiciary Square. Then join us for more fun in the hearing room. Details below:


Reject the Mayor’s Demolition Plan!
Tuesday, May 13th

Rally & Dance Party to
Facebook Event Page

Hosted by: DC for Reasonable Development

When:  Tuesday, May 13, 2014

  • Music starts at 5:15pm
  • The People’s Mic begins at 5:30pm
  • Defend the District Dance Party starts at 6:00pm
  • Zoning Commission hearing starts at 6:30pm (opportunity to provide public testimony)

Where:  DC Zoning Commission Office, 441 4th Street NW, Washington, DC (Metro: Red line, Judiciary Square station)


      • Luci Murphy — Activist, Poet, Singer, and Defender of DC Public Property
      • Jerry Peloquin — Founding Member of Jefferson Airplane and Municipal Food/Water Security Advocate

The proposed privatization of historic McMillan Park is one of the biggest attempted heists in DC history. We need you to get involved and help us stop the giveaway of this 25-acre Olmsted park — it is our public property!

More information:

PROTECT McMILLAN PARK & Reject the Mayor’s Plan!
Tuesday, May 13th — Rally 5:15pm to 6:30pm
441 4th Street NW, Judiciary Square

Unable to attend? Please Send Written Testimony to the Zoning Commission!

Donate button 1

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

Zoning Commission to VMP: Significant Room for Improvement on Housing and Grocery

Shoddy Construction

The DC Zoning Commission held the second of four formal hearings on Monday night focused on the housing and retail components of the Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) application to re-zone historic McMillan Park. During the over four-hour session, the Commission and Friends of McMillan Park’s counsel hammered VMP on (1) architecture and construction plans, (2) senior housing, (3) affordable housing, and (4) retail aspirations.

“A rooftop terrace is a poor substitute for a backyard.” EYA, the VMP partner known for its cookie-cutter townhomes built across the region, received the heaviest interrogation. The Commission expressed disappointment in the team’s request for “relief” on rear yard requirements and noted the need for more time to get comfortable with the proposed design. Questions also focused on the quality of materials planned for the townhome façades. “A building that doesn’t look good on the outside tends to reflect poorly on the whole plan,” the Commission noted, citing several local projects for which EYA has earned a reputation for low-quality design and finishes.

“Have you considered your seniors?” The Commission expressed great concern about the level of planning underlying the proposed senior housing component. With elderly residents isolated in a building farthest away from the hospital and grocery store, worries mounted about the accessibility, safety, and social offerings of the facility. Noting that the new Evarts Street would essentially be a commercial loading dock adjacent to a driveway for the disabled, the Commission called the plan “unacceptable” and “a real disappointment.” The Chair asked, “Are there any other opportunities for community other than sitting in the lobby and watching Dr. Oz?”

“We’d like to see closer to 30% of AMI.” The scant affordable housing included in the VMP proposal would provide subsidies to residents earning roughly $80,000 per year (80% of Area Median Income [AMI]), which fails to address the actual need of struggling families. The Commission stated that to be truly affordable, subsidies should target those earning 30% of AMI. During testimony, the Coalition for Smarter Growth criticized the affordable housing plan and suggested removing one of the two garage parking spaces planned per townhome unit to increase affordability for residents in need.

“Community support is contingent on the grocery store.” The prospect of a grocery store at McMillan Park has been a consistent selling point for neighbors. Based on VMP testimony, the future of the grocery store is hopeful at best. “We would like the flexibility to include a non-grocery alternative retail option if needed,” the team requested. The Commission sternly reminded VMP that community support depends upon a grocery store. Online comments echoed this sentiment: “I don’t like hearing ‘alternative retail’ in lieu of a grocery store – if this gets built, then I want a grocery store there,” said Scott Roberts of Bloomingdale. Stronghold resident, Sam Shipley, said, “Wait, what?! This is even an option? You’ve got to be kidding me! Why so many ‘unknowns’ with these guys?”

McMillan Park zoning hearings resume tonight at 6:30pm focused on the medical office building component of the proposal. Follow the discussion on twitter using hashtag #mcmillanzoning.

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

VMP Zoning Hearing Message to the Community: This Land is Not Your Land

McMillan Park Zoning Hearing 1 Protest

The DC Zoning Commission held the first of four formal hearings last Thursday on the Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) application to re-zone historic McMillan Park for high-rise office building and condo development. The take-away message for many residents in attendance and in the Twitter-sphere was that the proposed development would be more private country club than public space and that VMP was clueless about how to mitigate the sharp increase in vehicular traffic that would cripple the surrounding communities as a result of the project.

The hearing began in front of a packed room with the Commission denying the Friends’ motion to dismiss and then continued until 11:30pm. The most audible reactions to the proceedings in the room and on Twitter focused on four different points:

  1. According to VMP, the acres of impervious surfaces that they hope to build would absorb more storm water than McMillan Park’s existing 20-acre green roof.
  2. The new streets that they hope to create in the park to “alleviate traffic” would be privately owned and thus parking privileges would be at the whim of private managers. VMP’s traffic engineer, after admitting that no bussing improvements are planned before breaking ground, suggested as a solution to the major increase in traffic, “private transport options for residents” in what could turn into a Country Club-ification of McMillan Park.
  3. The proposed medical office buildings generated largely negative backlash. Reactions to the building images on Twitter were beyond harsh: “Looks like a first year architectural student has been playing with a computer drawing program,” said one, “makes me want to cry” said another, and more comically, “VMP’s renderings for McMillan redevelopment kinda look like Naboo storyboards from [Star Wars] Ep 1. And we all know how that turned out.” VMP spent $34,000 of taxpayer funds to produce the 5-minute 3D video according to information obtained via FOIA requests.
  4. The scant so-called “affordable housing” offering would provide subsidies to people making up to $80,000 per year, which fails to address the actual need.

Because of the intense opposition to VMP’s plan, an additional zoning hearing is scheduled for May 13th at 6:30pm. Friends of McMillan Park, in addition to gathering nearly 7,000 signatures on the petition to stop the VMP plan, has rallied supporters and submitted over 200 letters of opposition to the application to re-zone McMillan Park.

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

Call to Action – Please Send McMillan Park Testimony to Zoning Commission by May 27th

Dear Supporters:

We need your help.

We’ve reached another critical moment in the Gray Administration’s plan to destroy historic landmark McMillan Park and replace it with a plan designed by Vision McMillan Partners (VMP). The DC Zoning Commission will consider the Mayor’s latest development plans and request to re-zone the the Park for high rise buildings and massive development in a set of public hearings beginning on Thursday, May 1st at 6:30 PM.

To see VMP’s latest concrete box nightmare, click here.

VMP Big Box Nightmare

Like we did back in October with the Historic Preservation Review Board, we now need to flood the Zoning Commission with public comments in opposition to the lame duck Mayor’s plan. Let the Commission know that converting this historic Olmsted park into the proposed concrete monstrosity would cripple the surrounding communities with completely unacceptable impacts on traffic, parking, flooding, open space, and the environment. Please send your written testimony to the Zoning Commission by May 27th and attend the hearings to testify in person if possible.

Below we’ve included two sample letters as guidance for your letter to the Zoning Commission plus a list of points that you can use to tailor your draft.

Help us send the message to the Zoning Commission that this development plan is unacceptable for a Park that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places—our great city, the surrounding communities, and our historic landmark deserve better!

Are you available to testify in person at the Zoning Commission hearings on May 1st, 5th, 8th, 13th or 27th? Here’s what you need to know:  The hearings will take place at 441 4th Street NW, Room 220 South (Metro: Red line, Judiciary Square station). The zoning Case # is 13-14. Please bring printed copies of your testimony for the Commission if possible. If you have any questions, please contact or 202.234.0427.

Here are two sample letters to the Zoning Commission plus additional points:

Please see instructions below on how to present your views to the Zoning Commission for these important hearings.

To see all documents submitted for the hearings online:

Go to this web page:

Enter 13-14 in the ‘Search Term’ box, and click ‘Go.’ (13-14 is the “zoning case number” for the proposed VMP development). At the bottom of the page, beside information about case 13-14, click ‘View Details.’ On this page, under the ‘Case Documents,’ click ‘View Full Log’ and all the documents filed concerning this case will be visible, currently about 5 pages of them. To view any of these documents, click on ‘View’ on the far right side of any document.

To present oral testimony at the hearings:

Submit a copy of your written testimony before the hearing (see below) OR bring 12 copies with you to the hearing. Only 3 minutes are allowed for each speaker, 5 minutes for organizations, so submitting longer written testimony that you can refer to in your 3 minutes may help. The hearings will all take place at 441 4th St NW, Suite 220 South, all at 6:30PM. (Metro rail to the Judiciary Square station)

To submit written testimony:

Go to this web page to create an “IZIS Account” (necessary to submit any documents):

Then go to this page and log in with the login/password you created above: . Click on “file documents in an existing case,” and then specify case number 13-14, and ‘select’ that case in the next window. Click ‘choose file’ to select the document on your computer that you wish to submit as your written testimony, then select ‘document type.’ If you oppose the current development plan, you would select ‘Letter in Opposition.’ Your letter should explain your position and why you think McMillan Park should not be zoned to permit high-rise buildings. Then hit ‘Submit’ and your document should soon be visible in the list of documents for case 13-14 (see instructions above for how to see all documents for these hearings).

Please call or email us if you need help:  202.234.0427 or

Thank you for your support!

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped

Save the Date: McMillan Park Fundraiser Party at 410 GoodBuddy Gallery – Thurs, 27 Mar 2014

410 GoodBuddy Event

Donate button 1

Friends of McMillan Park is thrilled to invite you to the Save McMillan Park fundraiser cocktail party!

The event will take place on the evening of Thursday, March 27, 2014. Please join us for this fun-filled affair hosted by our friends at 410 GoodBuddy Gallery located on the border of the Bloomingdale and Shaw neighborhoods at 410 Florida Avenue NW, Washington, DC. The proceeds from this major event will benefit the Save McMillan Park Legal Fund to preserve our community’s endangered historic green space.

The evening will include food and drinks from local businesses, talented local artists, presentations from preservation and legal experts, and raffle prizes! Additional details coming soon.

McMillan Park Reservoir Historic District is currently endangered by commercial development that would destroy the park’s majestic underground caverns. Until WWII, the space was used by the DC community at large as a central park for recreation, cultural events, and gathering.

Friends of McMillan Park was founded by community supporters and neighbors who have fought tirelessly to protect McMillan Park since 1989. Our mission is to preserve, restore, and transform historic McMillan Park for the benefit of the public.

Please let us know if you, your business, or your associates would like to join our event Host Committee at the $250 level. Contributions are tax-deductible thanks to our 501(c)3 fiscal sponsor, National Association for Olmsted Parks.

General admission tickets are $100. All proceeds benefit the Save McMillan Park Legal Fund.  Please click here to purchase tickets or to donate otherwise.

For additional information, please contact Kirby Vining at (202) 213-2690 or

Facebook event page: 

FMP Logo 1 - 14Feb2014

410 GoodBuddy Party 2

McMillan Park Identity 2 - Cropped